Pass rate
91.3%
Above average — 18.4 pts ahead of the 72.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 206 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £21–£56
2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee MOT pass rate
- 2002
- 4 trims combined
- typical 88,643 mi
Check your postcode
Most common fault
Brakes
29.4% of faults · 20.9% nationally
mostly worn pads and discs, corroded pipes and a handbrake that will not hold.
Which year to buy
- Best 2002 91.3% pass · this year
- Avoid 2012 65.0% pass
Across the 21 years on record, a spread of 26.3 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 90.6%
- Typical mileage
- 89k mi
The 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee MOT pass rate is 91.3% of its MOT tests — 18.4 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 29.4% of what testers record.
Expert verdict
Brakes: 1.4× the national share
Brakes make up 29.4% of everything recorded on the 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee, against 20.9% nationally — 8.5 points above. Have the discs and pads measured rather than glanced at, and ask whether the handbrake holds on a slope.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these cars have been driven, the expected pass rate is 72.9% and this one manages 91.3% — 18.4 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
- Based on a small sample. 206 tests back this page. That is enough to publish and to index, not enough to treat the decimal places as precise — read the pattern, not the second digit.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Mazda Bongo Friendee? Get an email when these numbers change .
Every Mazda Bongo Friendee first registered in 2002 is combined here — 4 trim and body variants in total — so the sample is as large as the DVSA data allows.
How does the 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.9%, so this figure is 18.4 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 90.6%. The median 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee in this dataset had covered 88,643 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 90.5% of the time, April–September 91.9%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 3.88% of tests.
- 206 recorded tests behind this page.
- 91.3% overall pass rate, 90.6% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Mazda Bongo Friendee, the average is 78.5% — best year 2002 (91.3%), worst 2012 (65.0%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 206
- Typical mileage (median)
- 88,643 mi
- Make and model
- Mazda Bongo Friendee
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Ball Joint
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Bongo Friendee MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 75% so small gaps stay visible.
Where the Mazda Bongo Friendee is most common
Across all Bongo Friendee model years on record (2000–2021): 1,064 Mazda Bongo Friendee cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 2,556 tests. Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) has the most, with 139 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.
| # | Postcode area | Cars | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) | 139 | 94.7% |
| 2 | Halifax (HX) | 85 | 96.1% |
| 3 | Kingston upon Thames (KT) | 40 | 87.9% |
| 4 | Bristol (BS) | 34 | 68.9% |
| 5 | Plymouth (PL) | 33 | 78.2% |
| 6 | Southampton (SO) | 33 | 89.3% |
| 7 | Portsmouth (PO) | 26 | 68.2% |
| 8 | Stockport (SK) | 23 | 80.9% |
| 9 | Brighton (BN) | 22 | 69.6% |
| 10 | Gloucester (GL) | 18 | 69.5% |
| 11 | Exeter (EX) | 17 | 62.5% |
| 12 | Reading (RG) | 17 | 77.3% |
| 13 | Carlisle (CA) | 17 | 82.9% |
| 14 | Ashford (TN) | 15 | 75.0% |
| 15 | Cardiff (CF) | 14 | 60.0% |
| 16 | Newton Abbot (TQ) | 14 | 78.9% |
| 17 | Newport (NP) | 14 | 77.1% |
| 18 | Sheffield (S) | 14 | 83.9% |
| 19 | Dorchester (DT) | 13 | 65.7% |
| 20 | Poole (BH) | 13 | 64.7% |
The twenty areas with the most Mazda Bongo Friendee cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →
Regional pass rates for the Bongo Friendee
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| North East | 44 | 97.7% |
| South East | 41 | 92.7% |
| Yorkshire | 35 | 97.1% |
| South West | 30 | 90.0% |
| Wales | 18 | 83.3% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2002 Bongo Friendee
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2002 Bongo Friendee
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the suspension joints 3.9% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the lights 3.9% of tests
“headlamp lens slightly defective”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the windscreen 1.9% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2002 Bongo Friendee through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £21–£56 — and 48% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £21–£56
- Cheapest common item: rear fog lamp does not emit a steady red light
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
- £80–£200
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 80%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 48%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 206 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Bongo Friendee, side by side
21 model years on record, from 2000 to 2021. Across them the pass rate runs from 65.0% to 91.3% — a spread of 26.3 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 83.5% catalyst emissions carbon…
- 2001 83.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2002 91.3%ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2003 82.5% rear fog lamp not working
- 2004 89.0% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2005 77.7% component mounting prescribed…
- 2006 74.7% component mounting prescribed…
- 2007 74.1% component mounting prescribed…
- 2008 66.2% component mounting prescribed…
- 2009 65.9% component mounting prescribed…
- 2010 72.5% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2011 68.0% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2012 65.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2013 72.9% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2014 67.4% component mounting prescribed…
- 2015 70.3% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2016 75.5% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2017 78.0% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2019 88.7% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2020 88.9% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2021 87.3% position lamp not working
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2002 cars with a similar record
- BMW M3 86.7%
- Porsche 911 85.5%
- Mercedes-Benz Sl 85.2%
- Honda S2000 84.6%
- Mercedes-Benz Slk 81.2%
- BMW Z3 80.7%
Closest pass rates among 2002 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 238 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 70 | 29.40% | 20.89% | +8.51 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 49 | 20.60% | 12.21% | +8.39 |
| Suspension | 35 | 14.70% | 20.98% | −6.28 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 33 | 13.90% | 5.52% | +8.38 |
| Tyres | 23 | 9.70% | 19.76% | −10.06 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 12 | 5.00% | 5.57% | −0.57 |
| Visibility | 6 | 2.50% | 4.97% | −2.47 |
| Non-component advisories | 5 | 2.10% | 4.18% | −2.08 |
| Steering | 4 | 1.70% | 2.57% | −0.87 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 1 | 0.40% | 0.82% | −0.42 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 3.9% | £18–45 |
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 3.9% | £5–25 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 3.9% | £5–20 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 1.9% | £80–200 |
| Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 1.5% | £60–140 |
| Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 1.5% | £30–80 |
| Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension | Major | 1.5% | £18–45 |
| Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 1.5% | £5–25 |
| Rear fog lamp does not emit a steady red light Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 1.5% | £3–15 |
| Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Steering | Minor | 1.5% | £18–45 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 13.1% | £45–110 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Advisory | 12.1% | £18–45 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 11.7% | £200–700 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 5.8% | £45–95 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 2.9% | £45–95 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 2.4% | £40–150 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 3 | 100.0% | 23,534 mi |
| 30-60k | 43 | 95.3% | 48,707 mi |
| 60-90k | 58 | 94.8% | 71,058 mi |
| 90-120k | 59 | 89.8% | 102,710 mi |
| 120k+ | 43 | 83.7% | 151,747 mi |
Source: 206 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2002 Bongo Friendee MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee?
91.3% of the 206 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.9% for cars first used in 2002. First-attempt pass rate: 90.6%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee?
The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (3.88%), headlamp lens slightly defective (3.88%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (3.88%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 83.7% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee in this dataset had covered 88,643 mi.
Does the season affect the 2002 Mazda Bongo Friendee MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 90.5% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 91.9%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.