MOT PASS RATES

The Toyota Aygo 2015 by postcode

92.9% in IG vs 74.0% in AB — a 18.9-point gap for the same model and year

Postcode spread

Where the same car, same year, passes — and where it does not.

Toyota Aygo 2015 MOT pass rate by postcode area

The Toyota Aygo 2015 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 92.9% in IG down to 74.0% in AB — 18.9 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 109 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.

Best area IG · 92.9% 255 tests
Worst area AB · 74.0% 393 tests
National rate 84.0% all years of this model

What a 18.9-point gap means

Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2015 Toyota Aygo in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.9 extra failures — about £30–£77 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .

56 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Land Rover Defender (18.9). Narrower: Citroen C1 (18.8).

Rates are for the 2015 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.

Every postcode area, worst first

Area Pass rate vs national Tests
AB 74.0% -10.0 393
PA 74.6% -9.4 418
PH 76.9% -7.1 225
KY 76.9% -7.1 407
ML 78.1% -5.9 288
KA 78.6% -5.4 570
DD 79.2% -4.8 394
G 80.7% -3.3 1,526
FK 81.7% -2.3 541
TR 81.9% -2.1 420
DH 82.9% -1.1 584
EH 82.9% -1.1 1,072
NP 83.4% -0.6 771
HD 84.0% 0.0 420
DL 84.1% +0.1 435
CF 84.3% +0.3 1,637
HG 84.3% +0.3 236
WD 84.4% +0.4 359
PL 84.4% +0.4 526
SR 84.5% +0.5 367
OL 84.5% +0.5 793
TS 84.5% +0.5 658
WA 84.7% +0.7 902
CW 84.7% +0.7 373
SP 84.8% +0.8 231
LS 85.1% +1.1 847
LN 85.3% +1.3 443
ST 85.4% +1.4 1,360
SA 85.9% +1.9 1,761
WN 85.9% +1.9 524
AL 86.1% +2.1 359
HX 86.1% +2.1 245
BH 86.3% +2.3 700
SL 86.3% +2.3 299
NE 86.4% +2.4 1,424
BN 86.4% +2.4 1,335
NN 86.6% +2.6 704
TF 86.7% +2.7 263
BS 86.7% +2.7 1,695
SS 86.7% +2.7 581
YO 86.8% +2.8 820
PO 87.2% +3.2 1,049
TN 87.4% +3.4 1,196
TW 87.5% +3.5 495
NG 87.5% +3.5 1,686
BD 87.7% +3.7 786
HU 87.7% +3.7 480
CH 87.8% +3.8 926
LU 88.0% +4.0 399
SM 88.0% +4.0 233
HP 88.0% +4.0 541
LA 88.0% +4.0 358
TQ 88.0% +4.0 367
SG 88.0% +4.0 543
BL 88.1% +4.1 812
CB 88.1% +4.1 461
CA 88.2% +4.2 407
SN 88.4% +4.4 534
PR 88.4% +4.4 931
EX 88.4% +4.4 614
GL 88.4% +4.4 666
WS 88.5% +4.5 537
SY 88.5% +4.5 262
BA 88.6% +4.6 717
WF 88.6% +4.6 668
IP 88.8% +4.8 589
WR 88.8% +4.8 375
MK 88.8% +4.8 634
CT 88.8% +4.8 556
CV 88.9% +4.9 906
M 88.9% +4.9 1,661
L 89.0% +5.0 706
OX 89.0% +5.0 643
GU 89.0% +5.0 1,036
SW 89.1% +5.1 330
CM 89.1% +5.1 708
SK 89.3% +5.3 1,390
TA 89.4% +5.4 405
PE 89.4% +5.4 1,027
RG 89.4% +5.4 1,011
SO 89.5% +5.5 666
B 89.5% +5.5 2,289
HA 89.6% +5.6 356
S 89.7% +5.7 2,158
SE 89.7% +5.7 476
CR 89.8% +5.8 492
LE 89.9% +5.9 1,258
CO 90.0% +6.0 468
E 90.0% +6.0 339
FY 90.0% +6.0 502
HR 90.0% +6.0 211
BB 90.1% +6.1 821
DN 90.2% +6.2 1,036
EN 90.2% +6.2 437
KT 90.3% +6.3 464
DA 90.5% +6.5 451
NR 90.5% +6.5 1,043
ME 90.6% +6.6 951
DE 91.0% +7.0 1,202
RM 91.0% +7.0 401
DY 91.1% +7.1 615
UB 91.1% +7.1 381
RH 91.1% +7.1 946
LL 91.1% +7.1 665
WV 91.2% +7.2 546
N 91.4% +7.4 420
BR 91.7% +7.7 252
NW 91.9% +7.9 480
IG 92.9% +8.9 255

“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (84.0%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.

What this cannot tell you

For context, this model's best area runs 9 points above its own all-years national rate.

The full table AB area page All Toyota Aygo years