Pass rate
88.8%
Above average — 8.6 pts ahead of the 80.2% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 278 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £31–£94
2014 Toyota Noah MOT pass rate
- 2014
- typical 86,465 mi
Check your postcode
Most common fault
Suspension
24.0% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Part only £35–£75 for Suspension pin or bush excessively worn. What fitting it takes →
Which year to buy
- Best 2021 93.4% pass
- Avoid 2011 79.2% pass
Across the 14 years on record, a spread of 14.2 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 87.6%
- Typical mileage
- 86k mi
The 2014 Toyota Noah MOT pass rate is 88.8% of its MOT tests — 8.6 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 24.0% of what testers record.
Expert verdict
Lamps & electrics: 1.5× the national share
Lamps & electrics make up 18.5% of everything recorded on the 2014 Toyota Noah, against 12.2% nationally — 6.3 points above. Suspension is still the single largest share at 24.0%, but at 21.0% nationally that one is ordinary. Walk round the car with the lights on before the test: bulbs, indicators and number-plate lamps are the cheapest failures to prevent and among the most common.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these cars have been driven, the expected pass rate is 80.2% and this one manages 88.8% — 8.6 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 33% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Toyota Noah? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2014 Toyota Noah compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 80.2%, so this figure is 8.6 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 87.6%. The median 2014 Toyota Noah in this dataset had covered 86,465 mi.
57% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Hybrid, which passed 94.3% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 91.0% of the time, April–September 86.8%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated", noted on 4.68% of tests.
- 278 recorded tests behind this page.
- 88.8% overall pass rate, 87.6% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Toyota Noah, the average is 88.4% — best year 2021 (93.4%), worst 2011 (79.2%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 278
- Typical mileage (median)
- 86,465 mi
- Make and model
- Toyota Noah
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Body Panel Repair
Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.
Does mileage affect the Noah MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 70% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Hybrid is the most common here (57% of tests).
Where the Toyota Noah is most common
Across all Noah model years on record (2007–2021): 1,258 Toyota Noah cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 2,344 tests. Birmingham (B) has the most, with 193 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.
| # | Postcode area | Cars | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birmingham (B) | 193 | 97.0% |
| 2 | Romford (RM) | 68 | 94.7% |
| 3 | Stoke On Trent (ST) | 58 | 96.1% |
| 4 | Manchester (M) | 55 | 89.9% |
| 5 | London (E) | 50 | 94.6% |
| 6 | Ilford (IG) | 43 | 96.5% |
| 7 | Bradford (BD) | 40 | 94.8% |
| 8 | Blackpool (FY) | 31 | 94.1% |
| 9 | Guildford (GU) | 30 | 89.1% |
| 10 | Blackburn (BB) | 30 | 91.1% |
| 11 | Oldham (OL) | 29 | 92.0% |
| 12 | Leicester (LE) | 28 | 87.8% |
| 13 | Bolton (BL) | 27 | 94.2% |
| 14 | Nottingham (NG) | 27 | 83.7% |
| 15 | Derby (DE) | 25 | 78.3% |
| 16 | Wembley (HA) | 24 | 94.9% |
| 17 | London (N) | 22 | 91.4% |
| 18 | Hayes (UB) | 22 | 92.1% |
| 19 | Enfield (EN) | 21 | — |
| 20 | Southampton (SO) | 18 | 80.6% |
The twenty areas with the most Toyota Noah cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →
Regional pass rates for the Noah
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 78 | 88.5% |
| North West | 59 | 91.5% |
| West Midlands | 40 | 97.5% |
| London | 35 | 88.6% |
| East Midlands | 21 | 81.0% |
| Yorkshire | 19 | 100.0% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2014 Noah
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2014 Noah
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the suspension joints 2.5% of tests
“linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the lights 1.8% of tests
“headlamp lens slightly defective”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the tyre tread 1.4% of tests
“tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm”
Check all four tyres cold, including the inner shoulder where wear hides — 1.6mm across the central three-quarters is the legal limit, and most testers fail at 1.6mm without argument.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2014 Noah through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £31–£94 — and 33% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £31–£94
- Cheapest common item: rear fog lamp not working
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 80%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 33%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 278 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Noah, side by side
14 model years on record, from 2007 to 2021. Across them the pass rate runs from 79.2% to 93.4% — a spread of 14.2 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2007 81.6% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2008 80.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 79.8% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2010 82.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2011 79.2% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2012 85.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2014 88.8%joints constant velocity boot…
- 2015 88.6% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2016 87.8% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2017 89.1% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2018 92.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2019 92.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2020 89.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2021 93.4% rear fog lamp not working
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2014 Toyota Noah with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2014 cars with a similar record
- Mercedes-Benz Sl 88.8%
- BMW X5 88.9%
- Honda Jazz 89.0%
- BMW 535 88.5%
- Porsche Macan 88.4%
- Audi S3 88.4%
Closest pass rates among 2014 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2014 Toyota Noah 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 273 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 66 | 24.00% | 20.98% | +3.02 |
| Tyres | 52 | 18.90% | 19.76% | −0.86 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 51 | 18.50% | 12.21% | +6.29 |
| Brakes | 35 | 12.70% | 20.89% | −8.19 |
| Non-component advisories | 19 | 6.90% | 4.18% | +2.72 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 18 | 6.50% | 5.57% | +0.93 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 18 | 6.50% | 5.52% | +0.98 |
| Visibility | 8 | 2.90% | 4.97% | −2.07 |
| Steering | 3 | 1.10% | 2.57% | −1.47 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 3 | 1.10% | 0.82% | +0.28 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 4.7% | £80–250 |
| Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 2.5% | £18–45 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 2.2% | £18–45 |
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 1.8% | £5–25 |
| Rear fog lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 1.8% | £3–15 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 1.8% | £5–20 |
| Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension | Major | 1.4% | £18–45 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Major | 1.4% | £45–95 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Major | 1.1% | £40–150 |
| Rear fog lamp missing Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 1.1% | £3–15 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 11.5% | £45–95 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 5.4% | £200–700 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 5.4% | £40–150 |
| Swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 4.7% | £40–150 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 2.9% | £45–95 |
| Non-component advisories Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt Non-component advisories | Advisory | 2.9% | £20–80 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 8 | 100.0% | 23,505 mi |
| 30-60k | 73 | 91.8% | 49,355 mi |
| 60-90k | 78 | 89.7% | 76,163 mi |
| 90-120k | 61 | 91.8% | 100,339 mi |
| 120k+ | 57 | 78.9% | 159,121 mi |
Source: 278 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2014 Noah MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2014 Toyota Noah?
88.8% of the 278 2014 Toyota Noah tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 80.2% for cars first used in 2014. First-attempt pass rate: 87.6%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2014 Toyota Noah?
The three most recorded items are joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (4.68%), linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (2.52%), ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (2.16%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2014 Toyota Noah MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 78.9% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2014 Toyota Noah in this dataset had covered 86,465 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2014 Toyota Noah?
Hybrid: 94.3% pass rate across 159 tests. Petrol: 81.5% pass rate across 119 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2014 Toyota Noah MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 91.0% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 86.8%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.