Pass rate
70.1%
Below average — 2.8 pts behind the 72.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 1,750 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £27–£77
2002 Volvo S40 MOT pass rate
- 2002
- typical 98,715 mi
Check your postcode
Most common fault
Brakes
24.6% of faults · 20.9% nationally
mostly worn pads and discs, corroded pipes and a handbrake that will not hold.
Which year to buy
- Best 2012 74.4% pass
- Avoid 2003 69.5% pass
Across the 14 years on record, a spread of 4.9 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 60.9%
- Typical mileage
- 99k mi
The 2002 Volvo S40 MOT pass rate is 70.1% of its MOT tests — 2.8 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 24.6% of what testers record.
Expert verdict
Fewer problems with tyres
Tyres are 9.9% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Volvo S40? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2002 Volvo S40 compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.9%, so this figure is 2.8 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 60.9%. The median 2002 Volvo S40 in this dataset had covered 98,715 mi.
84% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Petrol, which passed 70.5% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 70.7% of the time, April–September 69.3%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 10.17% of tests.
- 1,750 recorded tests behind this page.
- 70.1% overall pass rate, 60.9% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Volvo S40, the average is 72.5% — best year 2012 (74.4%), worst 2003 (69.5%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 1,750
- Typical mileage (median)
- 98,715 mi
- Make and model
- Volvo S40
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Number Plate Lamp
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the S40 MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 56% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (84% of tests).
Where the Volvo S40 is most common
Across all S40 model years on record (2000–2013): 26,717 Volvo S40 cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 69,728 tests. Birmingham (B) has the most, with 907 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.
| # | Postcode area | Cars | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Birmingham (B) | 907 | 79.9% |
| 2 | Sheffield (S) | 705 | 73.8% |
| 3 | Peterborough (PE) | 599 | 73.6% |
| 4 | Nottingham (NG) | 598 | 71.9% |
| 5 | Leicester (LE) | 524 | 76.5% |
| 6 | Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) | 512 | 72.2% |
| 7 | Manchester (M) | 477 | 75.4% |
| 8 | Doncaster (DN) | 473 | 72.5% |
| 9 | Ipswich (IP) | 464 | 69.8% |
| 10 | Liverpool (L) | 456 | 74.4% |
| 11 | Coventry (CV) | 455 | 75.6% |
| 12 | Glasgow (G) | 454 | 70.7% |
| 13 | Northampton (NN) | 390 | 71.3% |
| 14 | Norwich (NR) | 379 | 72.9% |
| 15 | Edinburgh (EH) | 372 | 70.2% |
| 16 | Derby (DE) | 368 | 73.0% |
| 17 | Reading (RG) | 352 | 72.8% |
| 18 | Wrexham (LL) | 341 | 71.7% |
| 19 | Cardiff (CF) | 339 | 68.8% |
| 20 | Swansea (SA) | 330 | 69.8% |
The twenty areas with the most Volvo S40 cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →
Regional pass rates for the S40
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 398 | 70.1% |
| East of England | 212 | 72.2% |
| North West | 202 | 73.8% |
| South West | 185 | 61.6% |
| West Midlands | 168 | 74.4% |
| Yorkshire | 139 | 69.8% |
| East Midlands | 130 | 66.2% |
| Scotland | 96 | 67.7% |
| London | 90 | 83.3% |
| Wales | 89 | 65.2% |
| North East | 41 | 61.0% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2002 S40
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2002 S40
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 10.2% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the suspension joints 9.1% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the windscreen 4.6% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2002 S40 through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £27–£77 — and 36% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £27–£77
- Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
- £5–£20
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 80%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 36%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 1,750 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the S40, side by side
14 model years on record, from 2000 to 2013. Across them the pass rate runs from 69.5% to 74.4% — a spread of 4.9 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 72.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2001 71.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2002 70.1%registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2003 69.5% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2004 70.5% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2005 71.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2006 73.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2007 73.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2008 72.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 72.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 73.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2011 72.3% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2012 74.4% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2013 72.8% coil spring fractured or broken
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2002 Volvo S40 with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2002 cars with a similar record
- Citroen Saxo 70.0%
- MINI Mini 69.9%
- Ford Focus 70.4%
- Renault Clio 70.4%
- Peugeot 106 70.4%
- Suzuki Wagon-R+ 69.7%
Closest pass rates among 2002 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2002 Volvo S40 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 5,702 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 1,435 | 24.60% | 20.89% | +3.71 |
| Suspension | 1,286 | 22.10% | 20.98% | +1.12 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 910 | 15.60% | 12.21% | +3.39 |
| Tyres | 575 | 9.90% | 19.76% | −9.86 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 449 | 7.70% | 5.57% | +2.13 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 294 | 5.00% | 5.52% | −0.52 |
| Visibility | 243 | 4.20% | 4.97% | −0.77 |
| Steering | 208 | 3.60% | 2.57% | +1.03 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 158 | 2.70% | 1.76% | +0.94 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 144 | 2.50% | 0.82% | +1.68 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 10.2% | £5–20 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 9.1% | £18–45 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 5.3% | £5–25 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 5.2% | £80–250 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 4.6% | £80–200 |
| Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension | Major | 4.1% | £25–65 |
| Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 4.0% | £18–45 |
| Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 3.4% | £45–110 |
| Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Steering | Minor | 3.3% | £18–45 |
| Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility | Major | 3.2% | £8–22 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 21.7% | £80–180 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 17.7% | £45–110 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 14.2% | £45–95 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 13.3% | £45–95 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 11.4% | £40–150 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 8.9% | £200–700 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 18 | 83.3% | 19,124 mi |
| 30-60k | 206 | 79.1% | 48,355 mi |
| 60-90k | 482 | 73.4% | 76,464 mi |
| 90-120k | 528 | 68.0% | 104,159 mi |
| 120k+ | 514 | 64.8% | 152,605 mi |
Source: 1,750 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2002 S40 MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2002 Volvo S40?
70.1% of the 1,750 2002 Volvo S40 tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.9% for cars first used in 2002. First-attempt pass rate: 60.9%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Volvo S40?
The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (10.17%), ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (9.14%), position lamp not working (5.26%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2002 Volvo S40 MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 83.3% of the time, falling to 64.8% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2002 Volvo S40 in this dataset had covered 98,715 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2002 Volvo S40?
Petrol: 70.5% pass rate across 1,476 tests. Diesel: 67.5% pass rate across 271 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2002 Volvo S40 MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 70.7% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 69.3%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.