Calculate my fail sheet

2012 Volvo XC60 MOT pass rate

Check your postcode

Pass rate by postcode →

Pass rate

80.1%

Around average — 2.9 pts ahead of the 77.2% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 17,849 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £36–£99

Which year to buy

  • Best 2021 92.9% pass
  • Avoid 2008 77.5% pass

Across the 14 years on record, a spread of 15.4 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
75.4%
Typical mileage
113k mi

The 2012 Volvo XC60 MOT pass rate is 80.1% of its MOT tests — 2.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Tyres is the biggest single reason it fails, at 22.4% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2012 Volvo XC60 on the real record

80.1% of 2012 Volvo XC60 MOTs passed — 17,849 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Expert verdict

When it fails, it costs

Only 19% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Volvo XC60? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2012 Volvo XC60 compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 77.2%, so this figure is 2.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 75.4%. The median 2012 Volvo XC60 in this dataset had covered 113,121 mi.

The most common fuel recorded here is Diesel — 98% of tests, with a 79.9% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 80.4% of the time, April–September 79.7%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Coil spring fractured or broken", noted on 6.64% of tests.

  • 17,849 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 80.1% overall pass rate, 75.4% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Volvo XC60, the average is 84.3% — best year 2021 (92.9%), worst 2008 (77.5%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
17,849
Typical mileage (median)
113,121 mi
Make and model
Volvo XC60
Updated
2026-11-07

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Coil Spring

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the XC60 MOT pass rate?

0-30k 88.5%
30-60k 86.2%
60-90k 82.4%
90-120k 80.1%
120k+ 78.3%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 70% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Diesel 79.9%
Petrol 86.5%

Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (98% of tests).

Where the Volvo XC60 is most common

Across all XC60 model years on record (2008–2021): 132,005 Volvo XC60 cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 318,684 tests. Peterborough (PE) has the most, with 2,956 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.

# Postcode area Cars Share of all Tests Pass rate
1 Peterborough (PE) 2,956 2.2% 7,035 86.1%
2 Birmingham (B) 2,947 2.2% 6,557 86.3%
3 Nottingham (NG) 2,791 2.1% 6,926 84.3%
4 Sheffield (S) 2,788 2.1% 6,784 86.1%
5 Leicester (LE) 2,590 2% 6,146 86.7%
6 York (YO) 2,514 1.9% 6,871 80.7%
7 Reading (RG) 2,411 1.8% 5,962 85.9%
8 Guildford (GU) 2,261 1.7% 5,620 83.5%
9 Doncaster (DN) 2,110 1.6% 4,986 86.9%
10 Ipswich (IP) 2,100 1.6% 5,539 83.4%
11 Coventry (CV) 2,066 1.6% 4,700 86.8%
12 Southampton (SO) 2,007 1.5% 4,900 85.1%
13 Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) 1,998 1.5% 5,226 83.8%
14 Ashford (TN) 1,987 1.5% 5,063 83.3%
15 Norwich (NR) 1,962 1.5% 5,399 82.5%
16 Northampton (NN) 1,929 1.5% 4,593 84.4%
17 Derby (DE) 1,928 1.5% 4,454 86.5%
18 Chester (CH) 1,774 1.3% 4,625 82.9%
19 Oxford (OX) 1,758 1.3% 4,328 85.2%
20 Gloucester (GL) 1,733 1.3% 4,428 83.0%

The twenty areas with the most Volvo XC60 cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Regional pass rates for the XC60

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 3,436 81.5%
South West 2,403 77.4%
East of England 2,184 80.7%
Yorkshire 1,968 78.9%
North West 1,826 80.8%
West Midlands 1,578 82.2%
East Midlands 1,349 81.3%
Scotland 1,340 76.7%
Wales 897 79.3%
North East 611 78.9%
London 257 86.4%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2012 XC60

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Tyres 22.4%
+2.6 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Suspension 20.2%
−0.8 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 19.6%
−1.3 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 13.3%
+1.1 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Steering 5.5%
  • Advisories 5.4%
  • Visibility 4.4%
  • Body & chassis 3.4%
  • Emissions & leaks 2.8%
  • Identification 2.3%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2012 Volvo XC60 tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2012 XC60

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the coil springs 6.6% of tests

    “coil spring fractured or broken”

    Look up inside each wheel arch with a torch, all the way round the spring. A snapped spring usually breaks at the very bottom coil, where a quick glance will not reach.

  2. Check the lights 4.7% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  3. Check the windscreen 2.5% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2012 XC60 through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £36–£99 — and 19% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£36–£99
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
£80–£250
Common items a careful owner can do at home
70%
Repairs that still cost under £30
19%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 17,849 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the XC60, side by side

14 model years on record, from 2008 to 2021. Across them the pass rate runs from 77.5% to 92.9% — a spread of 15.4 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2008 77.5% coil spring fractured or broken
  2. 2009 78.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
  3. 2010 78.6% coil spring fractured or broken
  4. 2011 79.5% coil spring fractured or broken
  5. 2012 80.1%
    coil spring fractured or broken
  6. 2013 81.4% coil spring fractured or broken
  7. 2014 81.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  8. 2015 83.0% coil spring fractured or broken
  9. 2016 84.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
  10. 2017 86.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
  11. 2018 90.6% windscreen damaged but not…
  12. 2019 90.8% brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick
  13. 2020 91.2% brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick
  14. 2021 92.9% wipers blade defective

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2012 Volvo XC60 with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2012 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2012 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2012 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2012 Volvo XC60 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 26,329 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Tyres 5,939 22.40% 19.76% +2.64
Suspension 5,355 20.20% 20.98% −0.78
Brakes 5,192 19.60% 20.89% −1.29
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3,526 13.30% 12.21% +1.09
Steering 1,452 5.50% 2.57% +2.93
Non-component advisories 1,440 5.40% 4.18% +1.22
Visibility 1,161 4.40% 4.97% −0.57
Body, chassis, structure 902 3.40% 5.57% −2.17
Noise, emissions and leaks 749 2.80% 5.52% −2.72
Identification of the vehicle 613 2.30% 1.76% +0.54

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 17,849 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension Major 6.6% £25–65 Coil Spring →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 4.7% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 2.8% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 2.5% £80–200 Windscreen →
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Steering Minor 1.8% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Major 1.4% £18–45 Brake Pads Set →
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Major 1.4% £45–95 Tyres →
Track rod end ball joint has excessive play Steering Major 1.3% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure Major 1.2% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres Major 1.2% £45–95 Tyres →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 19.4% £45–95
Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Advisory 11.0% £18–45
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 7.5% £45–110
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 6.7% £40–150
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 5.6% £45–95
Brake discs significantly and obviously worn Brakes Advisory 4.6% £45–110

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 52 88.5% 24,334 mi
30-60k 848 86.2% 50,013 mi
60-90k 3,265 82.4% 77,466 mi
90-120k 6,130 80.1% 105,097 mi
120k+ 7,551 78.3% 148,833 mi

Source: 17,849 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2012 XC60 MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2012 Volvo XC60?

80.1% of the 17,849 2012 Volvo XC60 tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 77.2% for cars first used in 2012. First-attempt pass rate: 75.4%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2012 Volvo XC60?

The three most recorded items are coil spring fractured or broken (6.64%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.73%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (2.82%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2012 Volvo XC60 MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 88.5% of the time, falling to 78.3% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2012 Volvo XC60 in this dataset had covered 113,121 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2012 Volvo XC60?

Diesel: 79.9% pass rate across 17,471 tests. Petrol: 86.5% pass rate across 378 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2012 Volvo XC60 MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 80.4% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 79.7%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.