Calculate my fail sheet

2003 Volvo XC70 MOT pass rate

Check your postcode

Pass rate by postcode →

Pass rate

70.3%

Below average — 2.3 pts behind the 72.6% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 1,726 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £27–£82

Most common fault

Suspension

26.9% of faults · 21.0% nationally

mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.

Part only £35–£75 for Suspension pin or bush excessively worn. What fitting it takes →

13.5 pts down across model years — 16.4% in 2003, 2.9% in 2016.

Every failure, with what it costs →

Which year to buy

  • Best 2015 84.9% pass
  • Avoid 2003 70.3% pass · this year

Across the 16 years on record, a spread of 14.6 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
60.7%
Typical mileage
161k mi

The 2003 Volvo XC70 MOT pass rate is 70.3% of its MOT tests — 2.3 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 26.9% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2003 Volvo XC70 on the real record

70.3% of 2003 Volvo XC70 MOTs passed — 1,726 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Expert verdict

Suspension: 1.3× the national share

Suspension accounts for 26.9% of everything recorded on the 2003 Volvo Xc70, against 21.0% nationally — 5.9 points above. Ask for the front and rear suspension to be checked on a ramp before you buy — worn bushes and broken springs are cheap to look at and expensive to discover at test time.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Volvo XC70? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2003 Volvo XC70 compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.6%, so this figure is 2.3 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 60.7%. The median 2003 Volvo XC70 in this dataset had covered 161,008 mi.

78% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Diesel, which passed 70.0% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 69.6% of the time, April–September 71.3%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 9.68% of tests.

  • 1,726 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 70.3% overall pass rate, 60.7% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Volvo XC70, the average is 79.1% — best year 2015 (84.9%), worst 2003 (70.3%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
1,726
Typical mileage (median)
161,008 mi
Make and model
Volvo XC70
Updated
2026-11-07

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Number Plate Lamp

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the XC70 MOT pass rate?

30-60k 80.0%
60-90k 70.8%
90-120k 75.4%
120k+ 69.7%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 61% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Diesel 70.0%
Petrol 71.5%

Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (78% of tests).

Where the Volvo XC70 is most common

Across all XC70 model years on record (2002–2017): 24,718 Volvo XC70 cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 63,153 tests. Nottingham (NG) has the most, with 643 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.

# Postcode area Cars Share of all Tests Pass rate
1 Nottingham (NG) 643 2.6% 1,432 83.4%
2 York (YO) 607 2.5% 1,799 75.9%
3 Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) 503 2% 1,328 79.7%
4 Peterborough (PE) 496 2% 1,231 82.0%
5 Sheffield (S) 445 1.8% 1,119 83.6%
6 Reading (RG) 444 1.8% 1,085 81.7%
7 Exeter (EX) 440 1.8% 1,299 75.5%
8 Southampton (SO) 436 1.8% 1,146 81.2%
9 Edinburgh (EH) 431 1.7% 1,188 74.7%
10 Ashford (TN) 428 1.7% 1,165 79.6%
11 Norwich (NR) 397 1.6% 1,107 78.0%
12 Guildford (GU) 388 1.6% 1,058 78.0%
13 Ipswich (IP) 381 1.5% 1,031 79.5%
14 Birmingham (B) 381 1.5% 871 82.5%
15 Glasgow (G) 378 1.5% 941 81.8%
16 Oxford (OX) 367 1.5% 990 78.9%
17 Cardiff (CF) 363 1.5% 917 79.3%
18 Doncaster (DN) 363 1.5% 868 81.1%
19 Gloucester (GL) 344 1.4% 956 75.4%
20 Swansea (SA) 342 1.4% 973 78.3%

The twenty areas with the most Volvo XC70 cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Regional pass rates for the XC70

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 301 68.4%
South West 281 69.0%
East of England 194 67.0%
Yorkshire 187 72.7%
North West 164 72.0%
Scotland 135 65.2%
West Midlands 135 71.1%
East Midlands 117 73.5%
Wales 108 75.9%
North East 70 71.4%
London 34 79.4%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2003 XC70

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 26.9%
+5.9 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 18.7%
−2.2 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 15.8%
+3.6 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 10.0%
−9.8 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Emissions & leaks 7.6%
  • Steering 5.4%
  • Body & chassis 5.2%
  • Advisories 5.1%
  • Visibility 2.9%
  • Identification 1.7%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2003 Volvo XC70 tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2003 XC70

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the lights 9.7% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  2. Check the suspension joints 5.4% of tests

    “pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  3. Check the windscreen 3.3% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2003 XC70 through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £27–£82 — and 37% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£27–£82
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
£80–£250
Common items a careful owner can do at home
60%
Repairs that still cost under £30
37%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 1,726 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the XC70, side by side

16 model years on record, from 2002 to 2017. Across them the pass rate runs from 70.3% to 84.9% — a spread of 14.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2002 74.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
  2. 2003 70.3%
    registration plate lamp(s)…
  3. 2004 71.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
  4. 2005 72.2% headlamp lens slightly defective
  5. 2006 72.7% headlamp lens slightly defective
  6. 2007 74.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
  7. 2008 79.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
  8. 2009 80.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
  9. 2010 80.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
  10. 2011 80.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
  11. 2012 80.4% coil spring fractured or broken
  12. 2013 82.7% coil spring fractured or broken
  13. 2014 83.5% coil spring fractured or broken
  14. 2015 84.9% coil spring fractured or broken
  15. 2016 84.1% coil spring fractured or broken
  16. 2017 83.9% linkage ball joints ball joint…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2003 Volvo XC70 with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2003 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2003 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2003 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2003 Volvo XC70 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 5,629 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 1,528 26.90% 20.98% +5.92
Brakes 1,059 18.70% 20.89% −2.19
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 895 15.80% 12.21% +3.59
Tyres 570 10.00% 19.76% −9.76
Noise, emissions and leaks 430 7.60% 5.52% +2.08
Steering 305 5.40% 2.57% +2.83
Body, chassis, structure 296 5.20% 5.57% −0.37
Non-component advisories 290 5.10% 4.18% +0.92
Visibility 162 2.90% 4.97% −2.07
Identification of the vehicle 94 1.70% 1.76% −0.06

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 1,726 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 9.7% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 6.7% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Major 5.4% £40–150 Suspension Component →
Ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 4.1% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes Major 3.3% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 3.3% £80–200 Windscreen →
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 3.2% £30–80 Headlight Alignment →
Track rod end ball joint has excessive play Steering Major 3.2% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 3.0% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Linkage ball joints ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 2.7% £18–45 Ball Joint →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 27.4% £40–150
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 19.4% £45–95
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 19.1% £200–700
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 14.8% £45–110
Non-component advisories Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Non-component advisories Advisory 13.8% £120–300
Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened Suspension Advisory 7.9% £25–65

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
30-60k 20 80.0% 43,177 mi
60-90k 89 70.8% 75,357 mi
90-120k 199 75.4% 106,401 mi
120k+ 1,394 69.7% 181,530 mi

Source: 1,726 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2003 XC70 MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2003 Volvo XC70?

70.3% of the 1,726 2003 Volvo XC70 tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.6% for cars first used in 2003. First-attempt pass rate: 60.7%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2003 Volvo XC70?

The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (9.68%), position lamp not working (6.66%), pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn (5.39%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2003 Volvo XC70 MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 80.0% of the time, falling to 69.7% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2003 Volvo XC70 in this dataset had covered 161,008 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2003 Volvo XC70?

Diesel: 70.0% pass rate across 1,353 tests. Petrol: 71.5% pass rate across 369 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2003 Volvo XC70 MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 69.6% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 71.3%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.