2006 Mitsubishi Lancer MOT pass rate

Pass rate

77.2%

Around average — 4.7 pts ahead of the 72.5% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 3,549 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £22–£66

Most common fault

Suspension

28.3% of faults · 21.0% nationally

mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.

Part only £35–£75 for Suspension pin or bush excessively worn. What fitting it takes →

3.6 pts up across model years — 1.5% in 2004, 5.1% in 2011.

Every failure, with what it costs →

Which year to buy

  • Best 2018 96.2% pass
  • Avoid 2010 72.6% pass

Across the 20 years on record, a spread of 23.6 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
72.1%
Typical mileage
86k mi

The 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer MOT pass rate is 77.2% of its MOT tests — 4.7 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 28.3% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer on the real record

77.2% of 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer MOTs passed — 3,549 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Mitsubishi Lancer does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Suspension: 1.3× the national share

Suspension accounts for 28.3% of everything recorded on the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer, against 21.0% nationally — 7.3 points above. Ask for the front and rear suspension to be checked on a ramp before you buy — worn bushes and broken springs are cheap to look at and expensive to discover at test time.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Mitsubishi Lancer? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.5%, so this figure is 4.7 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 72.1%. The median 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer in this dataset had covered 86,069 mi.

The most common fuel recorded here is Petrol — 100% of tests, with a 77.1% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 75.3% of the time, April–September 79.4%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 6.51% of tests.

  • 3,549 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 77.2% overall pass rate, 72.1% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Mitsubishi Lancer, the average is 76.9% — best year 2018 (96.2%), worst 2010 (72.6%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
3,549
Typical mileage (median)
86,069 mi
Make and model
Mitsubishi Lancer
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Number Plate Lamp

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Lancer MOT pass rate?

0-30k 92.7%
30-60k 85.9%
60-90k 77.7%
90-120k 74.6%
120k+ 68.5%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 60% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Petrol 77.1%
LPG 90.9%

Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (100% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the Lancer

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 816 77.6%
South West 647 69.1%
North West 368 81.3%
East of England 352 79.5%
West Midlands 334 81.4%
London 211 82.9%
Yorkshire 208 79.3%
East Midlands 201 77.1%
Wales 180 72.8%
North East 120 79.2%
Scotland 112 78.6%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2006 Lancer

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 28.3%
+7.3 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 18.2%
−2.7 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 14.8%
+2.6 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 9.9%
−9.9 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Body & chassis 8.8%
  • Emissions & leaks 5.2%
  • Steering 4.8%
  • Visibility 3.7%
  • Advisories 3.7%
  • Identification 1.8%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2006 Lancer

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the lights 6.5% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  2. Check the suspension joints 3.9% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  3. Check the windscreen 3.3% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2006 Lancer through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £22–£66 — and 40% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£22–£66
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
£80–£200
Common items a careful owner can do at home
70%
Repairs that still cost under £30
40%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 3,549 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Lancer, side by side

20 model years on record, from 2000 to 2020. Across them the pass rate runs from 72.6% to 96.2% — a spread of 23.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2000 91.4% catalyst emissions lambda reading…
  2. 2001 90.6% position lamp with a multiple…
  3. 2002 90.9% ball joint dust cover severely…
  4. 2003 90.4% component mounting prescribed…
  5. 2004 89.7% catalyst emissions lambda reading…
  6. 2005 78.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
  7. 2006 77.2%
    registration plate lamp(s)…
  8. 2007 76.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
  9. 2008 75.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
  10. 2009 74.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
  11. 2010 72.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
  12. 2011 73.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
  13. 2012 83.5% catalyst emissions carbon…
  14. 2014 92.9% catalyst emissions lambda reading…
  15. 2015 92.4% catalyst emissions lambda reading…
  16. 2016 91.2% window excessively tinted but not…
  17. 2017 94.0% catalyst emissions carbon…
  18. 2018 96.2% rear fog lamp missing
  19. 2019 94.9% rear fog lamp not working
  20. 2020 89.9% catalyst emissions carbon…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2006 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2006 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2006 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 9,932 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 2,832 28.30% 20.98% +7.32
Brakes 1,823 18.20% 20.89% −2.69
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 1,481 14.80% 12.21% +2.59
Tyres 990 9.90% 19.76% −9.86
Body, chassis, structure 885 8.80% 5.57% +3.23
Noise, emissions and leaks 517 5.20% 5.52% −0.32
Steering 478 4.80% 2.57% +2.23
Visibility 371 3.70% 4.97% −1.27
Non-component advisories 370 3.70% 4.18% −0.48
Identification of the vehicle 185 1.80% 1.76% +0.04

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 3,549 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 6.5% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 5.0% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 3.9% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 3.3% £80–200 Windscreen →
Ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 3.0% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Linkage pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Major 2.9% £40–150 Suspension Component →
Track rod end ball joint has excessive play Steering Major 2.9% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 2.7% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Steering Minor 2.7% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Major 2.3% £40–150 Suspension Component →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 14.0% £40–150
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 12.3% £45–95
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 11.2% £80–180
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 11.1% £45–110
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 10.7% £45–95
Linkage pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 10.4% £40–150

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 137 92.7% 21,895 mi
30-60k 603 85.9% 47,657 mi
60-90k 1,223 77.7% 75,810 mi
90-120k 915 74.6% 103,183 mi
120k+ 658 68.5% 142,725 mi

Source: 3,549 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2006 Lancer MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer?

77.2% of the 3,549 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.5% for cars first used in 2006. First-attempt pass rate: 72.1%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer?

The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (6.51%), headlamp lens slightly defective (4.99%), ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (3.92%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 92.7% of the time, falling to 68.5% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer in this dataset had covered 86,069 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer?

Petrol: 77.1% pass rate across 3,533 tests. LPG: 90.9% pass rate across 11 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 75.3% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 79.4%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.